<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Circle Safety Blog &#187; Multi-Employer Job Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.circlesafety.com/tag/multi-employer-job-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.circlesafety.com</link>
	<description>Helping you move from Compliance to Excellence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Protecting the Public in Proximity to Construction Sites</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesafety.com/2009/12/protecting-the-public-in-proximity-to-construction-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.circlesafety.com/2009/12/protecting-the-public-in-proximity-to-construction-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JanThomas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi-Employer Job Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.circlesafety.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We usually think about safety on construction sites with the focus on workers.  The federal or state OSHA jurisdiction on commercial construction begins where an employer-employee relationship exists.  In addition, CPL 2-0.124 –Multi-Employer Citation Policy dictates overall jobsite safety between contractors.  So, when we need some basic guidance on safety we grab the OSHA standards. 
But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_326" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-326" title="CropperCapture[37]" src="http://blog.circlesafety.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CropperCapture37-300x227.jpg" alt="A city block of construction with security fences and traffic control devices (Photo: Jan Thomas)" width="300" height="227" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A city block of construction with security fences and traffic control devices (Photo: Jan Thomas)</p></div>We usually think about safety on construction sites with the focus on workers.  The federal or state OSHA jurisdiction on commercial construction begins where an employer-employee relationship exists.  In addition, <a href="http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=DIRECTIVES&amp;p_id=2024"><strong>CPL 2-0.124 –Multi-Employer Citation Policy</strong> </a>dictates overall jobsite safety between contractors.  So, when we need some basic guidance on safety we grab the OSHA standards. </p>
<p>But what about safety of the public – on adjoining streets or sidewalks, or across the fence in the school yard, or even across the intersection?  What about invited visitors on site?  OSHA is almost silent.</p>
<p>Some of the OSHA rules for protecting workers do secondarily protect the public.  For example, OSHA requires placarding of parked equipment, barricading of open trenches or the swing-radius of a crane, and using flaggers at traffic work zones. But these are few and indirect.</p>
<p>What may be needed is an actual plan for public safety, especially at sites where the public is ever present (city streets) or in high-risk areas (near schools).  Common sense may help guide such a plan but you may want to also check out a little-known consensus standard – <strong><a href="http://www.asse.org/cartpage.php?link=standards">ANSI/ASSE A10.34-2001 (R2005)</a>  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Protection of the Public on or Adjacent to Construction</span></strong>. </p>
<p>Here is a quick review.  The public is defined as “All persons and property not affiliated with the construction project.  This includes invitees to the construction project who are not employed by the project constructor or contractors.” What about trespassers?  They are excluded from the definition of the public.  But, be sure to put up those <em>No Trespasser</em> signs to defend your property rights.</p>
<p>The consensus standard provides guidelines for developing a site-specific public hazard control plan and emergency action plan.  Fourteen specific hazards are identified and the standard’s appendix provides a checklist.  The consensus standard is fairly short but is a great place to start your thought process for extending safety beyond the boundaries of your construction site.</p>
<p>(Note: this was first posted on November 6, 2009 at the Construction Law Musings blog &#8211; see <a href="http://constructionlawva.com/">http://constructionlawva.com/</a>.  My thanks to Chris Hill for continuing to invite me to provide guest posts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.circlesafety.com/2009/12/protecting-the-public-in-proximity-to-construction-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
