Posts Tagged ‘Crane Safety’

The OSHA Crane Standard – It’s still on the ground.

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

A broken anti-two block… on the ground while its crane is still in operation. (Photo: Jan Thomas)

I was going through my picture catalog, looking for inspirations for this blog when I came across this photo.  Here is the story…  a couple of summers back I seemed to follow one particular crane and operator around the region from job-to-job.  This crane was almost always without its required “anti-two block” – necessary when lifting personnel platforms and a good idea for all other types of lifts.

I kept asking that this be fixed.  It kept getting fixed.  And the next time I came across the operator he showed me his most recent two-block, on the ground after another failure to keep it up.  As you will notice, this wasn’t a brand new mechanism.  And, as you might suppose, there were some other issues here beyond a mere mechanical failure.  Questions were asked; people were spoken to and agreements put in place.  I’ve seen the crane recently and it proudly sported its anti-two block.

But, what this photo called to my mind was the question – what has happened to OSHA’s proposed  Cranes and Derricks standard for construction?   So far it’s been two-blocked and is lying on the ground.

NOTE ADDED – sortly after this was posted OSHA published the final standard – see OSHA crane page at http://www.osha.gov/cranes-derricks/index.html - the new standard becomes effective November 9, 2010.

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

Beware the “Fresh Breeze”

Friday, October 9th, 2009
Roofers several stories up, trying to batten down their materials during high gusts. (Photo: Jan Thomas)

Roofers several stories up, trying to batten down their materials during high gusts. (Photo: Jan Thomas)

The trees outside my office window are being blown by a “fresh breeze,” fall leaves whipping off.  The local weather station reports 18 to 20 mph gusts.  Last night I watched a Weather Channel report on workers in Japan being blown about by typhoon-generated winds of more than 85 mph.  All this reminds me that I’ve been meaning to write a blog on how to determine when windy conditions are safe for workers, cranes, and other outdoor material handling.  I’ve seen plenty of guys trying to carry sheets of plywood during high wind.  And, I really get concerned when the unloaded crane hook is swinging in the breeze.

I’m always being asked, “What’s OSHA’s rule on wind speed?”  That’s easy – there is NO general rule.  In fact, current OSHA General Industry and Construction standards say very little other than a few minor mentions in outdated crane standards.  That will change when OSHA finally adopts the new Subpart CCCranes and Derricks in Construction. (You saw that right – OSHA’s going into double alpha for their subparts.)

For example, proposed §1926.1417(h) states “when a local storm warning has been issued, the competent person shall determine whether it is necessary to implement manufacturer recommendations for securing the equipment.”  Suddenly, we have at least 3 entities that can help us make a decision – the National Weather Service, the on-site competent person, and the crane manufacturer!   The conditions of each crane pick are different and do depend upon on-site decisions.  Several sources, too numerous to list here, indicated that by the time wind gets to 20 – 25 mph it is getting too risky to operate cranes.

And, what about those workers lifting plywood and other materials on the roof?  When should they be concerned?  This should be obvious, but sometimes not to the supervisor tucked away in the office.  Check out the Beaufort Scale for land wind conditions.

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

Please Note: Analysis and opinions expressed are specific to the current discussion only. Different facts, changes in standards and codes, or other circumstances may lead to different results.