Archive for the ‘Consensus Standards’ Category

The Dreaded Portable Incandescent Hand Lamp

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Hand lamp being used as an extension cord at welding table in a heavy equipment repair shed open to the weather. (Photo: Jan Thomas)

I don’t like this type of portable lamp for several safety reasons.  First, I’ve done one too many accident investigations that involved an incandescent bulb “trouble light.”  The classic accident involves the mechanic that takes this lamp under the hood or under the equipment/vehicle and begins to work on the fuel system.  Dripping fuel + hot electrical bulb = explosion & pain.

Aside from applicable OSHA standards we have support from Underwriters Laboratory which specifically states that “these products are not intended for outdoor use unless marked “Suitable for Wet Locations,” or for use in hazardous (classified) locations…” (UL 298, the Standard for Safety of Portable Electric Hand Lamps).The other reason for worrying about employee use is that the handle on many lamps provides a plug – supposedly for attachment of a small appliance like a shop radio or small bench tool – but which is misused in industrial and construction sites as an “extender” for extension cords (see above).  The hand lamp is now susceptible to being dragged around on the floor or hitting metal. 

And, as a special side note… I usually find misuse of this type of equipment paired with a lack of GFCI protection, thus doubling the risk.

The solution – purchase heavy duty portable lighting with proper bulb protection and NO outlet on the handle.  Use GFCI!

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

A “Consensus of Concerned Interests”

Friday, August 28th, 2009
A local skateboard park… wait, this will make sense by the end of this blog. (Photo by Brian Evans, our IT manager and a park patron)

A local skateboard park… wait, this will make sense by the end of this blog. (Photo by Brian Evans, our IT manager and a park patron)

 

I came across this wonderful turn of phrase while doing some recent research in an American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) standard.  It so precisely explains the what, how, and why of our nation’s non-governmental, consensus standardization process.  

Unfortunately, I’ve found that most people in the workplace who make reference to a consensus standard developed by, say, ASME, ASTM, or ASSE (I’m only naming a few) don’t actually understand the distinctions between these organizations’ documents and ANSI (the federation or “mother ship” of concerned interests).  There is further confusion when we try to delineate clear boundaries between an OSHA standard that has been taken in part, adopted in whole, or referenced to a national consensus standard such as ANSI or NFPA.

A little “consumer education” will help.  We all buy consumer products, many of which show “accredited manufacturer’s” stamps (e.g., ASTM for toy safety).  But, does the general public know what those stamps indicate?  Safety professionals will understand what a manufacturer’s tag means when it says “always wear eye protection that meets ANSI Z87.1 requirements.” But, again, do the majority of professionals understand the distinctions between ANSI and one of its accredited Standards Developing Organizations (SDO) such as ASSE?  (Note: The official numbering for the eye protection standard is ANSI/ASSE Z87.1).

This topic of standardization and consensus development could take up a whole college course – maybe even one that I’ll get an opportunity to teach someday.  Such a course is not improbable since ANSI and its SDO’s are promoting “standards education.”    

So, get off that social networking site and spend some time reading the educational information on the consensus standard websites.  It’s actually all very interesting!  I suggest starting with http://www.ansi.org/about_ansi/introduction/history.aspx?menuid=1.   There is a simpler version at http://www.ansi.org/consumer_affairs/history_standards.aspx?menuid=5.  Then check out the new ASTM F2334 – 09 for Above Ground Public Use Skate Park Facilities… and you will view the above photograph with deeper appreciation.  A standard such as this guides the construction, operation and safety equipment required at a public use skate park and is just one example of a national consensus standard for all “concerned interests.”

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

Please Note: Analysis and opinions expressed are specific to the current discussion only. Different facts, changes in standards and codes, or other circumstances may lead to different results.