Archive for May, 2009

Comparison Shopping for Safety

Friday, May 29th, 2009
Buyer’s Guide above the extension cords in the electrical aisle at hardware store.

Buyer’s Guide above the extension cords in the electrical aisle at hardware store.

Part of what we do at Circle Safety is “mentor” people who have been designated as Safety Coordinator by their employer.

Recently I’ve started taking my clients to Lowes or Home Depot for a session on comparative safety shopping.  As we walk the aisles, I show them how to determine whether products meet two basic, important tests – OSHA compliance and best-practice. 

Consider that extension cord you want to buy.  If you have never researched the origins of OSHA standards on flexible cords and cables or dissected the meaning of “hard use” as applied to ratings then you may not make the best selection.  This is usually the case for most employees who are asked to order equipment or to go to the hardware store and pick up a new cord. 

As any good comparative shopper knows, you have to research and read labels.  And labels can be very deceptive.  I find this to be case with extension cord packaging/labeling.  That’s why I’m very grateful that the Home Depot and Lowes both have large instructional signs over their extension cord shelves.  So, yes, it’s getting easier to select the right extension cord but this isn’t the case for other electrical items typically seen in the workplace.

What about GFCIs, temporary lights or replacement plugs/ends for extension cords?  There is much confusion (some due to the OSHA standards), and a lot of outright deception in packaging. 

I’ve now introduced a hands-on workshop in our OSHA 10/30 hour training classes which gives attendees a chance to examine the boxes and attached labeling on commonly-used electrical products.  Those attending my Electrical Safety: Common and Not So Common Issues sessions at the 14th Annual Virginia Occupational Safety & Health Conference 2009 will get a chance to participate in comparison shopping for safety.

Jan Thomas, PhD, CSP
President & Consultant

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

VOSH Admin Rule

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Front cover of current VOSH ARM

Front cover of current VOSH ARM

VOSH Administrative Rules Require Compliance with Manufacturers’ Guidelines -

This is BIG.

This is Virginia-specific information but really should be of interest to all safety and health professionals. 

In the fall of 2005, the Virginia Safety and Health Codes Board considered the Virginia Department of Labor & Industry’s request to update 16VAC 25-60 better known as the VOSH Administrative Regulations Manual.  Anna Jolly, JD, CHMM, my business partner here at Circle Safety, is a long-time member of the Codes Board.  She received a briefing package of the proposed language and attended the March 2006 meeting where the changes were adopted after public hearing.  No big deal…

Soon after, Anna and I attended the 2006 VOSH Conference and had one of those impromptu but important hallway discussions; we were talking with Ray Davenport, Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Labor, and Glenn Cox, VOSH Director.  Mention was made of the inability of OSHA to keep up with technical changes and research-based knowledge in the workplace.  This is especially hard for us professionals who must continue to respond to the question, “Where in the OSHA standards does it say I have to do that?” Our VOSH colleagues spoke of how new ARM language might begin to take care of this problem.

Here is §130 of the ARM, which is specific to Construction.  The same language is given for General Industry, Agriculture and Maritime standards.  All language became effective September 21, 2006.

 ”The employers shall comply with the manufacturer’s specifications and limitations applicable to the operation, training, use, installation, inspection, testing, repair and maintenance of machinery, vehicles, tools, materials and equipment; unless specifically superseded by a more stringent corresponding requirement in Part 1926…”  (See full text at http://www.doli.virginia.gov/publications/pdfs/ARM_2006_booklet.pdf).

In future Circle Safety blogs we’ll discuss specific examples of this knowledge-based approach to safety.  This is BIG.  Dare I predict that OSHA will come around to this approach?

Jan Thomas, PhD, CSP
President & Consultant

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

Circle Safety’s Blog Launch

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Circle Safety’s Blog Launch at the
14th Annual Virginia Occupational Safety & Health Conference 2009

Some of the Circle Safety team at the 2008 VOSH Safety Conference lunch

Some of the Circle Safety team at the 2008 VOSH Safety Conference lunch

Everyone is blogging. I like to write and several of us here at Circle Safety do technical writing for our clients on a daily basis. It seems natural that we should promote professional practice through support of a safety blog. Yet, I recently told a colleague that I would never blog! Never say never! 

Welcome to Circle Safety & Health Consultants’ blog for full-time, part-time and collateral-duty safety and health professionals. We plan on drawing from our growing circle of consultants to provide a full range of observations, comments and discussions on topics of interest to occupational and environmental safety and health professionals. 

croppercapture6

Some of the Circle Safety team.

We have years of practical field experience – hard hats, safety glasses and well-worn safety boots in the vehicles, and plenty of safety resources. We’ve seen a lot and we’ve helped many organizations – small local start-ups to international firms – improve their EHS systems. We are always looking for ways to help move others from “compliance to excellence.” We have opinions and resources and we’d like to share them with our professional colleagues. So, let’s get started.

Jan Thomas, PhD, CSP
President & Consultant

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

Please Note: Analysis and opinions expressed are specific to the current discussion only. Different facts, changes in standards and codes, or other circumstances may lead to different results.