August 6th, 2010

Blackwell, Virginia water tower being repainted with fall protection in use! (Photo: Jan Thomas)
I have to admit, I took this photo as much for the “art” as for the science of appropriate fall protection displayed. Note how the foreground power lines seem to intersect with the tower’s structural components as well as the safety lines? Cool.
It’s also cool to be driving in rural Virginia and come across such a good example. Believe me, I’ve seen plenty of recent examples of workers trying to make a living while trying not to fall (see my blog on Low Bid = High Risk). And, be sure to check out the story published at eLCOSH of two lucky workers who survived a water tower fall due to the same system shown in my photo.
Tags: Fall protection
Posted in General Industry, Safety Photography | No Comments »
July 14th, 2010

A broken anti-two block… on the ground while its crane is still in operation. (Photo: Jan Thomas)
I was going through my picture catalog, looking for inspirations for this blog when I came across this photo. Here is the story… a couple of summers back I seemed to follow one particular crane and operator around the region from job-to-job. This crane was almost always without its required “anti-two block” – necessary when lifting personnel platforms and a good idea for all other types of lifts.
I kept asking that this be fixed. It kept getting fixed. And the next time I came across the operator he showed me his most recent two-block, on the ground after another failure to keep it up. As you will notice, this wasn’t a brand new mechanism. And, as you might suppose, there were some other issues here beyond a mere mechanical failure. Questions were asked; people were spoken to and agreements put in place. I’ve seen the crane recently and it proudly sported its anti-two block.
But, what this photo called to my mind was the question – what has happened to OSHA’s proposed Cranes and Derricks standard for construction? So far it’s been two-blocked and is lying on the ground.
Tags: anti two-block, Crane Safety, OSHA, proposed OSHA crane standard
Posted in Construction, Uncategorized | No Comments »
June 30th, 2010

August at the top of the construction and it's hot. (Photo: Jan Thomas)

One of several now available. (Sun Shield for Omega II Full Brim Hard Hats)
I’m just back from ASSE’s Professional Development Conference in Baltimore, Maryland. I’ve been going to these for over 25 years and have even presented at a number of them. Every year I have attended I’ve come back with new information from the educational sessions as well as from chats with professional colleagues. And, let’s admit it, we all love and learn from the vendor displays.
I almost always find one new “safety gadget” that causes me to say to myself “darn, if I only patented that idea when I first thought about it.” This year it came when I saw at several booths the “sun shield” for hard hats.
Yes, that patent would have been nice to tuck into my professional portfolio but it really belongs to the worker I photographed 3 summers ago on the top of a building.
I acknowledge that he has “modified” his hard hat and he may be out of compliance with 29CFR1926.100 (b) or ANSI Z89.1-1969, Safety Requirements for Industrial Head Protection but I have to admit that he had a good idea!
Keep cool and safe out there. Jan
Tags: Hard Hat Sun Shade, Heat Protection, Personal Protective Equipment
Posted in Construction | No Comments »
May 26th, 2010
![CropperCapture[80]](http://blog.circlesafety.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/CropperCapture80-300x116.jpg)
Jan at last year’s VOSH Conference discussing the finer points of purchasing the correct electrical safety equipment. (Photo: from Virginia Department of Labor & Industry video of session and off of their website)
A little bragging here… The
VOSH Conference has been growing every year since its inception 15 years ago. The idea for a professional gathering supported by Virginia Department of Labor and Industry was an idea that I suggested when I was the Chief Administrator of VOSH way back in the early 1980’s but it didn’t take off until 1995. By that time I was starting Circle Safety. I was honored to be an invited speaker at the first conference and have been invited back each year. That’s a lot of presentations.
This year I suggested speaking on how safety and health professionals can use Digital Photography in Support of Safety. Here is the brochure description:
This is not your typical accident investigation photography class. Instead, we will discuss the ever- growing opportunities to use – and misuse – digital photography in our safety and health efforts. Topics will include effective use of the camera as a tool in documentation of the workplace; camera selection (point & shoots are just fine); privacy and property rights, including legal and ethical issues; use of digital images for safety training and communication of safety messages; use of image- enhancing software. If you are reading this before the conference, you are invited to bring prints of your best examples of “digital safety.” We will set up an exhibit! All levels of photo experience are welcome – this is really about safety!
Those of you who have been following this blog will see my sneaky attempt to merge my professional work with my love of photography. If you are in the Northern Virginia – DC – Maryland region, please join us June 1 – 4, 2010. Day-tripper admissions are available. Follow the link above and bring your safety photos with you.
Tags: VOSH
Posted in All Industries, Safety Photography | No Comments »
April 29th, 2010

Recent renovation of a doctor’s x-ray room… note the drywall dust, reciprocating saw, and the sheets of lead… put the clues together. What might you also find? (Photo: Jan Thomas)
Sometimes I choose topics for this blog when the same issue crosses my desk or my awareness three times or more in close proximity. Lead exposure in the workplace is the most recent example.
A new EPA requirement came into effect on April 22, 2010. It impacts any contractor doing renovation, repairs and painting in pre-1978 housing or child-occupied facilities. The focus seems very specific and might not apply to all contractors. However, no one is turning down work today and renovation of existing spaces & LEED are up-swing trends so, just in case, we’ve been making sure all of our contractor clients know about this rule. See the Lead-Renovation Rule.
And then it became personal. I’ve just bought an historic house (read built in the late 1900’s and in need of some repair). During the last few weeks we’ve had interior reframing and repainting done. Even though I knew about the new rule, I saw how it might be applied to and impact small renovation companies.
But as I hope everyone knows, this renovation rule from EPA is only one of many such federal and state requirements. We also need to be aware of OSHA lead standards. The above photo from a recent audit shows the cutting and installation of lead-lined drywall. The company and their drywall sub were quick to respond when we discussed potential exposure.
And then today I dropped off a family heirloom stained glass window that needed repair and I ended up walking around the artist’s studio talking about lead exposures – yes, lead is still used and there was a lot of it with what looked like all the correct controls. So you see why I have lead on my mind. Be safe out there! Jan
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
April 12th, 2010

This is a picture from National Wind of a wind turbine under construction. Can you see the familiar hazards?
I recently attended an OSHA seminar in Washington, D.C. concerning the growth of “green jobs” and the role safety plays in those jobs. Green jobs are jobs related to preserving or restoring the environment or natural resources. Green however, does not mean a job is safe.
The focus of green jobs, carbon footprints and sustainability is to limit human impact on the natural environment. We do this by using new technologies in building construction to limit wastes, by creating new and different ways to produce energy and by rethinking the ways our industries operate with the end goal of being more environmentally friendly. What about safety? How can we use the things we have learned in the green movement and apply those to safety issues? How can we make green jobs safe?
The answer is easy. Green jobs are just like any other job, and it is essential to protect our nation’s workers on the job. The overall consensus was that green jobs are no different in terms of compliance as all the rest. Common hazards still exist, such as electricity, falls, heavy equipment, that can potentially injure or kill workers. Therefore, safety must not be forgotten when dealing with green jobs. A job is not sustainable unless all the workers come home safe!
We can also use some techniques of the green jobs movement to improve the way we “do” safety. At this conference one of the speakers introduced a safety system based on the LEED model that was geared toward safety. This model uses a LEED type points system in construction projects as a way to rate them based on the importance given to safety and the degree of implementation of safety elements. Essentially it is a scoring system for how safe a job is. Using a system such as this, safety remains an essential component in the construction industry.
Green jobs MUST be safe jobs!
Rating System: http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/jspui/bitstream/1957/3805/1/Rajendran%20Dissertation%20Report.pdf
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
March 18th, 2010

Worker climbing metal fabricated stairs placed in sidewalk, behind a barrier and running along facade. (Photo: Jan Thomas)
Thanks to Adam Thompson for posting a Circle Safety blog while I’ve been traveling. Adam has an environmental specialty that adds nicely to the safety and health services we provide. Sometime soon he will post his ideas on how the LEED industry and safety match-up.
Meanwhile, let me show you some of my travel photos… As readers know, I like to take photos of construction sites. On my recent trip to France I paid particular attention to construction. Was it happening? How large were the sites? How many tower cranes could I count from the Eiffel Tower or Montmartre Cathedral?
My impression is that construction is steady. There are many sidewalk barricades for building and storefront renovations. In the central districts the count was at least one every other block. Plenty of tower cranes were in use but this was probably due to a lack of ground. And what is “normal” in the old world? Construction vans, superintendents’ trailers, haulage equipment and excavators—even barricades—are all small. Almost like toys.

Small tower crane on a tight footprint of new construction where old facade was maintained. Along Avenue des Champs-Élysées. (Photo: Jan Thomas
What about safety? On the larger jobsites safety – as we know it – is present. On the small store front renovations… o’la, la… OSHA would be saying something to the small “white van” construction guys.
These two photos are from a “large” site where an older building came down – they left the front façade and entrance arch and are building a new interior.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
March 12th, 2010

Good use of silt fence as inlet protection and matting for erosion control.
We have a substitute blogger for this week. Jan is out of the country and hopefully enjoying herself. This blog will focus on an environmental compliance issue that is of concern to the construction industry in Virginia and beyond. Stormwater management can be a major headache in the planning process for new construction, and new legislation is being considered right now in the Virginia General Assembly. You all need to know what you need to do.
Stormwater is a major pollutant of our nation’s groundwater. A lot of that pollution comes directly from construction sites. Sediment, suspended solids, nutrients, oil and grease, pesticides and metals are all common pollutants from stormwater runoff. These things end up in our drinking water! I don’t think I want to pour a glass of iced “Roundup” rather than iced water. Yuck!
So, what does a construction company need to know? Well, first off, you need a permit. But only if the area of disturbed land is equal to or greater than one acre. Now if you are in an area subject to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, and your disturbance area is equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet, then you need a permit. Check these in the planning stage of work.
The most important part of this permit is the requirement for a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Your SWPPP outlines how you will comply with the permit. This document serves as your “bible” in ensuring the protection of groundwater from pollutants in your site’s area. The Department of Conservation & Resources deals with the permits and, along with the Environmental Protection Agency, may perform inspections of your site.
Basically, you need your permit and your SWPPP before you start work, and you need to follow that SWPPP as closely as possible to avoid citations. Remember, you wouldn’t want to be drinking in metals and oils on a hot summer day, so do your part to protect our drinking water!
Refer to http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/soil_and_water/vsmp.shtml for more info on Stormwater Management.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
February 10th, 2010

Housekeeping not so good. And how many hazards can you find? (Photo: Jan Thomas)
You’re driving into the worksite, getting out of your vehicle and walking to the office. Maybe you are the insurance agent on an annual audit, or maybe the corporate safety director doing the rounds, or a third-party safety auditor. Or you’re the newest employee reporting for duty, or the OSHA officer entering the site. The general first impression of the facility or construction site or office complex or any other workplace really gives the first clue as to how safety is valued.
I’ve been saying this to clients for years. Get your housekeeping in order! Build good looking guards! Keep the PPE looking “sharp.” Make it look good and you will also make it safe! Don’t you think the next photo provides a better first impression?

This site was so well organized there were very few suggestions for improvements. (Photo: Jan Thomas)
Tags: Housekeeping
Posted in All Industries, Safety Advise | No Comments »
February 1st, 2010

Hand lamp being used as an extension cord at welding table in a heavy equipment repair shed open to the weather. (Photo: Jan Thomas)
I don’t like this type of portable lamp for several safety reasons. First, I’ve done one too many accident investigations that involved an incandescent bulb “trouble light.” The classic accident involves the mechanic that takes this lamp under the hood or under the equipment/vehicle and begins to work on the fuel system. Dripping fuel + hot electrical bulb = explosion & pain.
Aside from applicable OSHA standards we have support from Underwriters Laboratory which specifically states that “these products are not intended for outdoor use unless marked “Suitable for Wet Locations,” or for use in hazardous (classified) locations…” (UL 298, the Standard for Safety of Portable Electric Hand Lamps).The other reason for worrying about employee use is that the handle on many lamps provides a plug – supposedly for attachment of a small appliance like a shop radio or small bench tool – but which is misused in industrial and construction sites as an “extender” for extension cords (see above). The hand lamp is now susceptible to being dragged around on the floor or hitting metal.
And, as a special side note… I usually find misuse of this type of equipment paired with a lack of GFCI protection, thus doubling the risk.
The solution – purchase heavy duty portable lighting with proper bulb protection and NO outlet on the handle. Use GFCI!
Tags: GFCI, Hand Lamp Safety
Posted in All Industries, Consensus Standards | 1 Comment »